Legal Opinion
Fazio v. Hayhurst
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1966No. Civ. 591PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered following an order sustaining respondent’s general demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint without leave to amend.
The original complaint asserted a cause of action seeking to recover damages against the estate of a deceased attorney for alleged malpractice, and was filed April 1, 1965. Demurrer was sustained to that complaint on the ground that it was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. Leave to amend, however, was given in this ruling.
Appellant thereafter filed a first amended complaint, alleging in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Alter v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Griffith v. ZavlarisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- DeGarmo v. Luther T. Mayo, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.