State v. Reese
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
By his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury by expressing an opinion in violation of G.S. 1-180. This assignment is without merit.
The record discloses that when the trial judge was instructing the jury on the sixth element of felonious larceny, he instructed as follows: “And, sixth, that the property was worth more than $200, and all the evidence which we have, that’s been submitted, indicates that the property was worth some $550, but you must find beyond a reasonable doubt that it was worth more than $200 as an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. LampkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HaireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. HermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980