State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Defendant’s counsel, in apt time, requested the trial judge to instruct the jury on the crime of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, N.C.G.S. 14-72.2(a), as a lesser included offense.
The court declined so to do and defendant assigns this as error. We agree with defendant and for this reason a new trial must be ordered.
It is true that the Supreme Court in State v. Wall, 271 N.C. 675, 157 S.E. 2d 363 (1967), held that a violation of former N.C.G.S. 20-105, sometimes referred to as “temporary larceny” of a vehicle, was not a lesser included offense of larceny. See State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. . StinnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. CowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.