Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1980No. 796SC943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant’s counsel, in apt time, requested the trial judge to instruct the jury on the crime of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, N.C.G.S. 14-72.2(a), as a lesser included offense.

The court declined so to do and defendant assigns this as error. We agree with defendant and for this reason a new trial must be ordered.

It is true that the Supreme Court in State v. Wall, 271 N.C. 675, 157 S.E. 2d 363 (1967), held that a violation of former N.C.G.S. 20-105, sometimes referred to as “temporary larceny” of a vehicle, was not a lesser included offense of larceny. See State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. McCrarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. . StinnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. CowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API