State v. Dickerson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for nonsuit. The State’s evidence, summarized above, was clearly sufficient to take the case to the jury on the charge of felonious larceny. What argument there is on this appeal concerns primarily the quantum of evidence as to the value of the stolen personalty on the date of the theft. We find the State’s evidence on this element was sufficient to support the jury finding that the value of the Plymouth exceeded $200.00 on the date it was stolen. There was evidence that only a few months previously the owner…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. ArdreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019