Legal Opinion
Howell v. Richardson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1989No. 88-346PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
I
The present action was brought pursuant to R.C. 3929.06. This section provides as follows:
“Upon the recovery of a final judgment against any firm, person, or corporation by any person, including administrators and executors, for loss or damage on account of bodily injury or death, for loss or damage to tangible or intangible property of any person, firm, or corporation, for loss or damage on account of loss or damage to tangible or intangible property of any person, firm, or corporation, or for loss or damage to a person on account *367of bodily injury to one’s spouse or minor child or children,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Commonwealth Casualty Co. v. HeadersOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Wright v. SchickOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Hainbuchner v. MinerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by51 opinions
- Gehm v. Timberline Post & FrameOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Vankirk v. Green Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lattanzi v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.