Legal Opinion

Lattanzi v. Travelers Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 93-2404PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

We are compelled to hold in this case that where an insured is kidnapped in her own automobile, and incurs all bodily injury outside and away from the automobile, the insured is not covered within the uninsured motorist provisions of her automobile insurance policy which limits coverage to bodily injuries “caused by accident” and which “arise out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured motor vehicle.”

This qourt has dealt at least twice before with cases involving similar issues. In Kish v. Cent. Natl. Ins. Group of Omaha (1981), 67 Ohio St.2d 41, 21 O.O.3d 26, 424 N.E.2d 288,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Howell v. RichardsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bakos v. Insura Property & Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Danis v. Great American InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Estate of Nord v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. DarstOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Feldkamp v. Usaa Insurance CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API