Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we determine whether an order denying an insurance company’s motion for leave to intervene is a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. We hold that the denial of a motion to intervene, when the purpose for which intervention was sought may be litigated in another action, does not affect a substantial right that determines the action and prevents the judgment. As a result, the denial of the motion in this case is not a final, appealable order sufficient to establish jurisdiction for appellate review.
I. Background
{¶ 2} In October 2004, Harry Gehm filed a complaint…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Howell v. RichardsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Sawicki v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas Cty.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Farmers Market Drive-In Shopping Ctrs. v. Magana, 06ap-532 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.