Legal Opinion

Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2007No. Nos. 2005-2137 and 2005-2384PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we determine whether an order denying an insurance company’s motion for leave to intervene is a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02. We hold that the denial of a motion to intervene, when the purpose for which intervention was sought may be litigated in another action, does not affect a substantial right that determines the action and prevents the judgment. As a result, the denial of the motion in this case is not a final, appealable order sufficient to establish jurisdiction for appellate review.

I. Background

{¶ 2} In October 2004, Harry Gehm filed a complaint…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Scruggs v. SadlerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Howell v. RichardsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Sawicki v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas Cty.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Farmers Market Drive-In Shopping Ctrs. v. Magana, 06ap-532 (5-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API