Legal Opinion

Wright v. Schick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1938No. 26917PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The appellants seriously urge that the controlling issue in both the Althea Wright and Bertie Wright cases was whether the insurance policy was in force when they were injured and, that issue having been litigated and determined in the affirmative in the Althea Wright case wherein Schick and the insurance company were adverse parties, such adjudication is conclusive as to the Bertie Wright case and requires a judgment accordingly under the doctrine of res judicata. This contention is deserving of careful consideration.

After having secured judgments against Schick in their tort actions, Althea…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Quinn v. State Ex Rel. LeroyOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Renfro v. HanonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McKee v. Producers & Refiners Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. v. McKees Rocks BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Heinz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Howell v. RichardsonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API