Brown v. Centex Homes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TYSON, Judge.
Centex Homes (“Centex”) and Mary Kathryn Kroening (“Kroening”) (collectively, “defendants”) appeal order entered 11 May 2004 granting Centex’s motion to stay and compel arbitration and denying Kroening’s motion to stay and compel arbitration. We reverse and remand.
I. Background
On 21 January 2002, James S. Brown, Jr., and Jacky A. Rosati (“plaintiffs”) met with Kroening at a sales office owned by Centex located in the Becket’s Ridge Subdivision in Hillsborough, North Carolina. Plaintiffs looked at a home located adjacent to a wooded piece of property. Plaintiffs asked Kroening…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Slaughter v. SwicegoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Prime South Homes, Inc. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hager v. Smithfield E. Health Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- Ellison v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Inception Mining, Inc. v. Danzig, Ltd.District Court, D. Utah · 2018
- State v. BarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Inception Mining, Inc. v. Danzig, Ltd.District Court, D. Utah · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.