Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 2012No. COA11-619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

Betty Barr (“Defendant”) was charged and convicted of illegally accessing and aiding and abetting in the access of a government computer in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-454.1(a)(2) and (b). On appeal, we must determine whether the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss, whether an indictment was fatally defective, and whether the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury. We conclude there was no prejudicial error in the judgments *331convicting Defendant in Case Nos. 10 CRS 1557, 10 CRS 1558, and 10 CRS 1559. However, the portion of the judgment…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. In re T.J.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. FinchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API