Legal Opinion

People v. Kennedy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Allegan. (Padgbam, J.) Bespondent was convicted of a violation of the liquor law in not removing all curtains, screens, etc., that obstructed the view from the street of the bar where lienors were sold. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a prosecution for a violation of section 31 of the liquor law, being section 22834, 3 How. Stat. This section provides that—

“During the time when, by the provisions of this act, places where liquor is sold or kept for sale must be closed, all cur-tains, screens, partitions, and other things that obstruct the view, from the sidewalk, street, 'alley, or road in front of or at the side or end of said building, of the bar or place in said room where said liquors are sold or kept for sale, shall be removed. Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of this section shall, upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Robison v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. QuiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API