Legal Opinion
People v. Kennedy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1913No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Exceptions before sentence from Wayne; Hosmer, J. James D. Kennedy and Charles J. Kennedy were convicted of a violation of Act No. 62, Pub. Acts 1911 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 5299).
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The respondents were charged in the information, which followed the complaint and warrant, with a violation of certain of the provisions of Act No. 62 of the Public Acts of 1911 (2 How. Stat.. [2d Ed.] §5299), entitled:
“An act to prohibit certain classes of immoral advertising and provide punishment for violators thereof.”
Section 1 of the act, in so far as it applies to the first count in the information, is as follows:
“Any person who shall advertise in his own name' or * * * firm or pretended firm, * * * in any * * * pamphlet, circular * * * an advertisement of the treating or curing of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Strang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- People v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Black v. DelayeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mitchell Family Planning Inc. v. City of Royal OakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
- State v. HollinsheadOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. ByrneNew York Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.