Legal Opinion
People v. Comstock
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Mason; McMahon, J. Chester W. Comstock was convicted of violating the banking law.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant was convicted upon a charge that he had violated section 58 of the general banking law, being 3 How. Stat. § 3208/7, which reads as follows:
“Seo. 58. Every president, director, cashier, treasurer, teller, clerk, or agent of any bank, who embezzles, abstracts, or willfully misapplies any of the moneys, funds, credits, or property of the bank, whether owned by it or held in trust, or who, without authority of the directors, issues or puts forth any certificate of deposit, draws any order or bill of exchange, makes any acceptance, assigns any note, bond, draft, bill of exchange,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. LilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- United States v. HarperUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
- People v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. Van AlstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. Joeseype JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. Richard JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- McClure v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- People v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.