Legal Opinion
People v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1913No. Docket No. 126PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Exceptions before sentence from Ingham; Wiest, J. William Smith was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor to an habitual drunkard contrary to statute.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
The information in this case contained two counts. Under the first the respondent was charged with having made an illegal sale of intoxicating liquor to one Edwin Bowman, a person in the habit of getting intoxicated. 2 Comp. Laws, § 5391 (2 How. Stat. [2d Ed.] § 5067). Under the second count respondent' was charged (the same act being counted upon) with having made an illegal sale of intoxicating liquor to said Bowman; respondent having been theretofore—
“Forbidden in writing by Gottlieb Reutter, mayor of said city of Lansing, to sell, furnish, and give away any spirituous, malt, brewed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Fosdick v. Van ArsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Porter v. ThroopMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. KeeferMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CzckayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Newton v. Consolidated Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. MyersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.