Legal Opinion

Heal v. International Agricultural Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 26, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of warranty in the sale of commercial fertilizer, and comes up on motion and exceptions.

Sometime in the Spring of 1917 the plaintiff purchased from the International Agricultural Corporation, through its subsidiary, the Buffalo Fertilizer Works of Houlton, Maine, six (6) tons of commercial fertilizer, and used it in planting six acres of potatoes on his farm in Lagrange. The fertilizer was forwarded by the defendant in a two-car-load shipment to the Lagrange Farmers’ Union, which distributed it to the plaintiff and other customers from the cars…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shippen v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Knight v. Overman Wheel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Dean v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  5. Wilson v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Powers v. RosenbloomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  2. Libby v. Woodman Potato Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API