Wilson v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, S. D. Wilson, from an order of the District Court of Itasca County, G. W. Holland, J., made January 15, 1894, denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The material allegations of the complaint are that plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the latter-*150agreed to sell and did sell to the former, for $2,600, to he paid in installments, all of the pine timber, represented to be 2,500,000 feet, standing and growing on certain land; that the defendant fraudulently, and with intent to deceive plaintiff, stated and represented to him that he was the owner of the timber. Although not expressly alleged, it is fairly implied that the agreement was that the timber was to be cut and removed by the plaintiff, and, no time being stated,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ross v. . MatherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by13 opinions
- Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Steller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Clark v. B. B. Richards Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Brown v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.