Legal Opinion
Rudo v. Geren
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-2172PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying in Part and Holding in Abeyance in Part The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Holding in Abeyance in Part the Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff, a former service-member, seeks judicial review pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., of the decision by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) regarding the characterization of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fulbright v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Albino v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Saint-Fleur v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McDonough v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Bennett v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.