Legal Opinion

People v. Ingram

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that County Court erred in failing to direct the People to disclose the name of the confidential informant. Although the testimony of the informant was material, defendant failed to establish any weakness in the People’s

*987case or that the issue of identification was a close one so as to entitle him to disclosure (see, People v Pena, 37 NY2d 642; People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert denied 419 US 1012). In any event, that contention is academic because immediately before trial defense counsel was provided…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. GowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. BROWN, LASEAN J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API