People v. Johnson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGarry, J.
Initially, defendant contends that his convictions are logically inconsistent with his acquittals on the charges arising from the first two transactions because the People had contended at trial that the Cl purchased drugs from the same seller on all three occasions. We disagree. The transactions were separate events that occurred on different days, and the People’s proof relating to the third purchase was considerably stronger than that concerning the first two. Two police officers testified that they saw defendant’s face, and positively identified him as the person they had observed selling…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. ColavitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. RolleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MunizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. GaudiosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.