Legal Opinion

People v. Ashby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in failing to direct the People to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. "Although the testimony of the informant was material, defendant failed to establish any weakness in the People’s case or that the issue of identification was a close one so as to entitle him to disclosure (see, People v Pena, 37 NY2d 642; People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert denied 419 US 1012)” (People v Ingram, 217 AD2d 986, 986-987). In any event, the contention is academic because defendant testified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. MacAnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. DawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API