Legal Opinion

People v. Pena

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1975PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.

On this appeal by the People, the sole issue is whether the trial court properly denied defendant’s application for disclosure of the identity of a confidential informer.

After a trial by jury, the defendant was convicted on all counts of an indictment charging him with the sale and possession of dangerous drugs. The Appellate Division, Second Department (45 AD2d 1038), by a divided court, reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial so that the informer can be produced. For the reasons which follow, we believe that order should be reversed.1

*644The identity of persons communicating information…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. New York v. GogginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Langert v. TenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  5. Langert v. TenneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. LeyvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. GilmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. TayehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. VaccaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API