Legal Opinion

Raymond Orrand v. Hunt Construction Grp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 30, 2017No. 16-3822Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENT

2Dissent · ClayClay, Circuit Judge

We are asked to decide whether Plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeking payment of benefits in accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement is “inconsistent with or contrary to” a separate decision by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) resolving a jurisdictional work dispute between two competing labor unions. The majority concludes that such an inconsistency exists and dismisses the action. This decision is unsupported by precedent and repudiates the parties’ contractual intent, as set forth by the applicable collective bargaining agreement. Therefore, I respectfully…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union v. National Labor Relations Board, Sea-Land Service, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API