Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1996No. Civil Action 95-85PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER OF COURT

AMBROSE, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is the Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (Docket # 37) filed by Plaintiff John W. Mathews (“Plaintiff Mathews”). Plaintiff Mathews has alleged on behalf of himself and a putative class (excluding Defendants and their directors, officers, agents, servants and affiliates), encompassing “all persons residing in the United States who purchased partnership units in KP/Miller Realty Growth Fund I, KP/Miller Growth Fund II and KP/Miller Realty Growth Fund III in the initial offering of such…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Hallowell v. CommonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., A Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Krear v. MalekDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Rowe v. Marietta Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API