Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 16, 1998No. 97-3164PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Chief Judge.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act” or “PSLRA”), amends 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) to eliminate, as a predicate act for a private cause of action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), any conduct actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities. See Pub.L. No. 104-67, § 107, 109 Stat. 737, 758. This civil RICO case was brought by plaintiff John W. Mathews (“Mathews”), a disappointed investor, alleging misconduct — including securities fraud — by several investment houses in connection…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ponnapula v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Scott v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Claudius ATKINSON, Appellant. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. United States Customs & Border Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API