Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Marietta Corp.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided January 29, 1997No. 92-2963-DPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT MARIETTA CORPORATION’S MOTION IN LIMINE ON DAMAGES AND GRANTING DEFENDANT MARIETTA CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the court are (1) the motion in limine of defendant Marietta Corporation (Marietta) to dismiss Counts I, V, and VI of the Second Amended Complaint (SAC) as time-barred and to preclude the plaintiffs (collectively, Rowe) from claiming any damages from alleged shortfalls in earn out calculations for fiscal years 1989, 1991 and 1992, 1 and (2) the motion of Marietta for judgment on the pleadings on Count IX of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cape Ann Investors v. LeponeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Scott v. BoosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- John W. Mathews v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.