Legal Opinion
Dupont-Lauren v. Schneider (USA), Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 21, 1998No. CIV. A. H-95-5345PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant Pfizer Inc.’s (“Pfizer”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (# 49) and Defendants Pfizer and Schneider (USA), Inc.’s (“Schneider”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 50). Having reviewed the pending motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, this court is of the opinion that Pfizer and Schneider’s motion for summary judgment should be granted, rendering Defendant Pfizer’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings moot.
2Cases cited132 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lindsley v. TRT HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
- Metro. Transit Auth. of Harris Cnty. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Harris v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy of Wilmington, Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.