Legal Opinion

Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy of Wilmington, Delaware, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 7, 2006No. 04-4628PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Michele Curay-Cramer, a teacher at the Ursuline Academy, a private, Catholic school, was fired after she signed her name to a pro-choice advertisement in the local newspaper. Curay-Cramer asserts both that signing the advertisement was conduct protected by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and that she was fired for conduct less egregious under Catholic doctrine than conduct of male employees who were treated less harshly. The District Court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). We will affirm but, in doing so, we do not adopt all…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Toth v. California University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Howard v. Blalock Electric Service, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Mitchell v. MillerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Saeemodarae v. Mercy Health ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  5. Culler v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API