Legal Opinion
Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 19, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 91-0083PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
FACTS
On March 23, 1989, Farmers issued an automobile insurance policy which insured Bai Quy Do and his relatives against the risk of loss from injury. This policy provides liability insurance in the amount of $50,000 per person, and $100,000 per accident. The policy includes the relatives of the insured as “covered persons.” The policy also contains a “household exclusion” which provides that coverage does not apply when any family member of an insured residing in the same household is injured.
On April 1, 1989, while Bai Quy Do was driving the insured vehicle, he had a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bogue v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Wareing v. FalkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Tobel v. State, Dept. of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- John Deere Insurance v. West American Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.