Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1926No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The City of Philadelphia was granted authority by the Act of June 17, 1913 (P. L. 520), to engage in the business of transportation of passengers for hire. It was permitted to build subways, elevated structures, and surface lines, provide the necessary motor equipment, and furnish power required. Lines so constructed may be operated by the municipality itself, or the right given to others for limited periods upon the payment of agreed rentals. If deemed wise, the system installed, or any part thereof, can be sold. At its own expense, it erected an elevated railway…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Moore v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Philadelphia v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Murray v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Wright v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. White Oak Borough Authority AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API