Legal Opinion

Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. MacKey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1921No. 211PublishedCited by 68 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. This was a suit brought in the District Court by the present appellants to avoid and enjoin enforcement of a special street improvement tax. The appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court of'Appeals reversing a judgment in their favor.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. This was a suit brought in the District Court by the present appellants to avoid and enjoin enforcement of a special street improvement tax. The appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court of'Appeals reversing a judgment in their favor. The facts are stated in the opinion, post, 534. The purpose of the acts of Congress_was not alone to provide transportation, but both acts have as their principal object the development of the coal laiids belonging to the Indians, and to this end the purchasers of the property and franchises…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beandeis

This suit was brought in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma by the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company to have declared void a special assessment for street improvement made against part of its right of way and station grounds in the City of Holdenville, Oklahoma, and to enjoin the taking of any proceedings to enforce the same. The Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad Company, the lessor, was joined as plaintiff. The defendants are the county treasurer, the city, and holders of bonds issued to pay for the improvement. The street improved, called…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Attorney General of CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API