Legal Opinion

Moore v. Luzerne County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1918No. Appeal, No. 5PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal, No. 5, Jan. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., June T., 1915, No. 379, for plaintiff, for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of C. H. Moore v. County of Luzerne. Assumpsit on a contract of employment. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Before Carman, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered judgment for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 5, Jan. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., June T., 1915, No. 379, for plaintiff, for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of C. H. Moore v. County of Luzerne. Assumpsit on a contract of employment. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Before Carman, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered judgment for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff sued the defendant county upon a written contract of employment dated December 23, 1911, and made between him and the county commissioners. By it he agreed to furnish the plans, designs, drawings, specifications and descriptions for, and to supervise, inspect and report upon the construction of part of a certain county road; in consideration of which he was to receive six per cent, of the entire cost of construction. Ee averred his readiness and willingness to proceed under the contract; that it was revoked on January 25, 1912, by a later board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Hanover TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Kidder Elevator Interlock Co. v. MuckleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Western Saving Fund Society v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Scott v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Mitchell v. Chester Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API