Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Hulen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The first question to determine pertains to the reformation of the deeds. It is disclosed by the record that Mary A. Ramp, thé mother of defendant, Sarah L. Hulen, out of love and affection for her daughter, made, executed and delivered to the daughter Sarah L. Hulen, two deeds of gift of two farms, one known as the “McKinney Farm” and the other the “Schmitke Farm.” Mrs. Hulen did not pay her mother a dollar for said deeds. Mrs. Hulen described the delivery of the deed of the McKinney Farm dated October 14, 1903, as follows: When she and her husband were living on a farm in Polk County, her…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Croxall v. ShererdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Baker v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Frazer v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Perozzi v. GaniereOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. CRAHANE v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API