Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Arenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1941PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The case turns on the proper construction of the Efird deed of 1 March, 1920. This deed conveys an estate to “M. E. J. Kelly and her heirs by T. D. Kelly.” At common law such an estate was a fee tail special, which is converted by C. S., 1134, into a fee simple absolute. Revis v. Murphy, 172 N. C., 579, 90 S. E., 573.

According to our previous decisions, C. S., 1739, providing that “a limitation by deed, will or other writing, to the heirs of a living person shall be construed to be the children of such person,” applies only when there is “no precedent estate conveyed to said living person.”…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Elmore v. AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Artis v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Ferguson v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API