Legal Opinion

Fields v. Fields

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1931PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The issue presented here concerns the intention of the testator in the disposition of his property as evidenced by his last will and testament.

The plaintiffs claim that the estate bequeathed and devised by paragraph 3 of the testator’s will was subsequently diminished and cut down by a later provision of'the will. Conversely, it is contended by the defendants that the testator neither intended to cut down, nor did cnt down or debase the fee simple estate willed to his wife.

In the interpretation and construction of a will, the cardinal rule is to ascertain the intention of the testator from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Mee v. . GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Closset v. BurtchaellOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In Re the Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gildersleeve v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Deaconess Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Unander v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Conness'estateArizona Supreme Court · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API