Moore v. Mann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county against-John Mann and the Lion Bonding and Surety Co. to recover $192 upon defendant’s bond to secure the faithful execution of a contract. The case was tried before Brill, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Mann. From the judgment entered in favor of defendant surety company, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover upon a bond given by them to one Dittenhofer to recover for certain work done by the plaintiff for the defendant Mann. There were findings in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Mann and in favor of the defendant surety company against the plaintiff. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered pursuant thereto.
Dittenhofer was making some improvements about his home. Mann did the work under a contract. The plaintiff did work for Mann. The bond was executed by Mann and the surety company to Dittenhofer. The surety…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- American Building & Loan Ass'n v. WaleenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Price v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fjellman v. WellerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- St. Paul Foundry Co. v. EvensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Vermont Marble Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926