Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Vermont Marble Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 13, 1926No. 3704PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlschuler, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The bond was executed and delivered in Minnesota, was between a Minnesota corporation and a foreign corporation authorized to transact business there, the mausoleum in question was to be constructed there, and the contract was there to be carried out. The bond is clearly a Minnesota contract, and its scope and the liability thereunder must be tested by the laws of Minnesota.
In Jefferson et al. v. Asch et al., 53 Minn. 446, 55 N. W. 604, 25 L. R. A. 257, 39 Am. St. Rep. 618, it appears that a landowner leased the land to one Benz, who in turn sublet it to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Harriet State Bank v. SamelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Michaud v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Moore v. MannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Surety Co. v. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Central States Grain Co-operative, Inc. v. Nashville Warehouse & Elevator Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Phillips Co. v. Constitution Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.