Legal Opinion

Flores v. Herrera

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 2015No. 35,286; Docket No. 32,693; Docket No. 33,413PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} We address two appeals that raise issues concerning the scope of the Whistleblower Protection Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 10-16C-1 to -6 (2010). During her term as Secretary of State, Defendant Mary Herrera terminated the employment of James Flores and Manny Vildasol. Separately, Mr. Flores and Mr. Vildasol sued Ms. Herrera claiming that, in relevant part, by terminating their employment, Ms. Herrera violated the Act. The two cases were decided by different district judges sitting in the First Judicial District. Ms. Herrera lost the general election in November 2010…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Baker v. HedstromNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ford v. New Mexico Department of Public SafetyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flores v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Flores v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API