Flores v. Herrera
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAKAMURA, Justice.
{1} In this case, we are called upon for the first time to interpret the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA), NMSA 1978, §§ 10-16C-1 to -6 (2010), to resolve a single issue: Does the WPA allow a state employee to assert a claim against a state officer in the officer’s individual capacity? Mary Herrera, when acting as the Secretary of State, terminated the employment of two employees of the Secretary of State’s office, James Flores and Manny Vildasol. In separate actions, Flores and Vildasol each asserted a WPA claim against Herrera in her individual capacity. Herrera…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Alejandro v. Robstown Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Cabinet for Families & Children v. CummingsKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Velasquez v. Regents of Northern N.M. Coll.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- N.M. Dep't of Game & Fish v. RawlingsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Maestas v. Town of TaosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State Ex Rel. CYFD v. Douglas B. and State Ex Rel. CYFD v. Sara E.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- Gandydancer, LLC v. Rock House CGM, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.