Ford v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
This appeal raises novel issues in the law of judgments. One theme permeating the law of judgments is that a litigant is ordinarily not entitled to more than one fair bite at the apple. This theme finds expression in two doctrines familiar to all litigators. The doctrine of claim preclusion (a more descriptive term for what has often been denominated res judicata) prevents a party from repeatedly bringing the same cause of action against the same person. See Three Rivers Land Co. v. Maddoux, 98 N.M. 690, 694-96, 652 P.2d 240, 244-46 (1982), overruled on other grounds by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Deflon v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Barreras v. State Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Valdez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.