Beedle v. Bennett
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Bill in equity to restrain infringements of letters-patent. The patent expired by its own limitation after the filing of the bill, and before final decree.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Bill in equity to restrain infringements of letters-patent. The patent expired by its own limitation after the filing of the bill, and before final decree. The final decree and allowance of appeal were as fdllows: “ This cause coming on to be heard upon the pleadings in agreed statement of facts and arguments of counsel, the court finds the reissued letters-patent sued on valid, and to have been infringed by defendant, and that the complainants have an established license fee of $10 per well driven by the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
This is a bill in equity filed by the appellees May 15, 1883, to restrain the alleged infringement of reissued letters-patent No. 4372, issued to Nelson W. Green, for a driven well. The cause was heard by stipulation between the parties upon an agreed statement of facts set out in the record, as follows :
“ For the purpose of saving the expense of taking testimony, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto that the above cause and the others hereinafter referred to may be tried upon the following agreed statement of facts, said statement to be accepted as proof of the facts recited…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by40 opinions
- Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Andrews v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Busch v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Van Allen v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.