Andrews v. Hovey
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. This was a petition for a rehearing of the case, decided at this term and reported in 123 U. S. at page 267. The allegations and prayer of the petitioners were as follows: “ And now come your petitioners, the appellants herein, by their counsel, Joseph C.- Clayton and Anthony Q. Keasbey, and respectfully suggest to this Honorable Court that, after having sustained the priority and novelty…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. This was a petition for a rehearing of the case, decided at this term and reported in 123 U. S. at page 267. The allegations and prayer of the petitioners were as follows: “ And now come your petitioners, the appellants herein, by their counsel, Joseph C.- Clayton and Anthony Q. Keasbey, and respectfully suggest to this Honorable Court that, after having sustained the priority and novelty of the invenWn and the validity of their original patent and its reissue in numerous decisions of -the Circuit Courts…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford
This is a petition by the appellants in the case of Andrews v. Hovey, reported in 123 U. S. 267, for a rehearing of that case upon the points upon which the decision was based.
The suit was a suit in equity, brought by the appellants for the infringement of reissued letters-patent No. 4372, granted to Nelson W. Green, one of the appellants, May 9, 1871, for am “ improvement in the method of constructing artesian wells,” the original patent, No. 73,425, having been granted to said Green, as inventor, January 14, 1868, on an application filed March 17, 1866. The Circuit Court had dismissed the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The J. E. RumbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.