Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Maes

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2010No. C062967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

Penal Code section 2933 1 allows state prisoners who participate in qualifying work, training, and educational programs the privilege of earning postsentence conduct credit against their sentences. (Id., subd. (a) [the statute refers to this credit as “worktime credit”].) Section 2933.05 authorizes postsentence credit for a prisoner’s successful completion of specific program performance objectives in approved rehabilitative programming. (Id., subd. (a).) However, section 2933.2, subdivision (a) provides that “any person who is convicted of murder . . . shall not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. GalvezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. In Re PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Criminal Justice Legal Foundation v. Dept. of Corr. & Rehab.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API