Legal Opinion
People v. Cole
California Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 2006No. S121724PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.—Sections
Sections 655 and 2556 of the Business and Professions Code prohibit certain business and financial relationships between registered dispensing opticians and licensed optometrists. We granted review in this case to consider whether the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Health & Saf. Code, § 1340 et seq.) (Knox-Keene Act) creates an exemption to these prohibitions when a licensed specialized health care service plan sublets space within the retail stores of a registered dispensing optician and employs optometrists to provide professional optometric…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Club Members for an Honest Election v. Sierra ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Olson v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings Corp.California Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. C.H.California Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. ManzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.