Legal Opinion

In Re Pope

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2010No. S160930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

50 Cal.4th 777 (2010)

114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 225

237 P.3d 552

In re NATHAN POPE on Habeas Corpus.

No. S160930.

Supreme Court of California.

August 19, 2010.

S. Michelle May, under appointment by the Supreme Court, and Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner Nathan Pope.

Bill Lockyer and Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorneys General, James M. Humes, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Frances T. Grunder and Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorneys General, Stephen P. Acquisto, Jennifer A. Neill, Jessica N. Blonien and Krista L. Pollard, Deputy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. NilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. AlfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. LossingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API