In the MATTER OF, Joseph Peter BARRETT, an Attorney at Law.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
In this ethics proceeding, we are called upon to consider whether an attorney who received a 150-day suspension for knowing misappropriation of law firm funds in Utah -- a jurisdiction that applies a preponderance of the evidence standard and recognizes no business dispute defense -- may, based only on the Utah record, be disbarred under New Jersey's clear and convincing evidence standard.
We conclude that in this case, Rule 1:20-14(a), which governs reciprocal discipline, does not permit "substantially different discipline" from that imposed in Utah. R. 1:20-14(a)(4)(E). While a lawyer's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Matter of SiegelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- In Re GalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- In Re PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Office of Professional Conduct v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.