Legal Opinion

Office of Professional Conduct v. Barrett

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2017No. Case No. 20150190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Himonas,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Attorney Joseph Barrett exchanged legal services for construction work on his home and yard, thereby depriving his law firm, Snow, Christensen & Martineau P.C. (SCM), of the legal fees accrued from those eases. The district court suspended Mr. Barrett from the practice of law after it concluded that Mr. Barrett’s conduct violated rule 8.4(c) of the Utah Rules of Professional Con duct. The Office of Professional Conduct (OPC) appealed, urging us to hold that the intentional or knowing misappropriation of firm funds, like the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of Discipline of InceUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Long v. ETHICS AND DISCIPLINE COMMITTEEUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Discipline of Alvin LundgrenUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re the Discipline of CoreyUtah Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Disp.of R. LaJeunesseUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Lajeunesse v. LajeunesseUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Professional Conduct v. Dahlquist (In Re Discipline of Dahlquist)Utah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. In the MATTER OF, Joseph Peter BARRETT, an Attorney at Law.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API