Legal Opinion

Matter of Siegel

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 23, 1993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter arises from a grievance filed with the District XIV Ethics Committee by the law firm of McCarter & English (M & E) against one of its former partners, respondent, Steven G. Siegel. The complaint charged respondent with three counts of unethical conduct in violation of Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c), which prohibits “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” The first count charged respondent with fabricating disbursements and misappropriating funds of M & E, the second count with submitting false expenses against a client’s account, and the third with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EzrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. In the Matter of Dennis M. Barlow, an Attorney-At-LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility Of The Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Charles Edward DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re ImbrianiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API