Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Pena

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 12, 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Angel Pena was admitted to practice law in New Jersey in 1984. Respondents Glen M. Rocca and Michael S. Ahl were admitted to practice law in New Jersey in 1983. All three respondents were partners in a law practice at all times relevant to these disciplinary proceedings. The respondents maintain law offices in Fort Lee and Union City. Courtney Krause and Costantino Santorella, the grievants, and the trial judge who presided over a related civil ease, brought the matters to the attention of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

District VI Ethics Committee filed a complaint alleging that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. In Re LoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. In Re HowellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SanseverinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. In the Matter of SamaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Dynasty Bldg. Corp. v. AckermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. In re SigmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API