Legal Opinion

McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 18, 1980No. 58-75PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Robert J. Yock, filed August 13, 1979, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration *357thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the decision as the basis for its judgment in this case and, accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to recover with judgment entered for plaintiff as set forth in the following Conclusion of Law.

OPINION OF…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Joyce v. GentschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Guggenheim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
  5. J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Foote Mineral Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Frank R. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. General Elevator Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Document Management Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. KORFF v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API