Legal Opinion

Guggenheim v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 5, 1948No. 46775PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff sues to recover $10,093.11 income tax plus certain interest, alleged to have been overpaid for 1938 and 1939 by reason of the failure of the defendant to allow deductions for certain nontrade and nonbusiness expenses which were not allowable at the time plaintiff’s returns were audited but which plaintiff claims are allowable now by reason of Section 121(a) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 798, 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Acts, page 187. The defense is not only on the merits but also on the ground of .a settlement agreement entered into by the parties at the time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Joyce v. GentschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Walker v. Alamo Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  5. Backus v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. F. R. Daugette, and F. R. Daugette and Mary E. Daugette v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue, for District of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Uinta Livestock Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Arthur L. Stair and Bernice Stair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Four Star Capital Corp. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API